Each person is unique and complex. This is even more true with TEAMS of individuals. This report identifies where teams can improve their chances of success and to become more effective. Similarly, you will find within these pages indicators on how each individual can improve team effectiveness, team climate, and generally become better colleagues. Use this report to plan training and decide how to guide and modify a team's composition to improve the collective ability to reach goals. We are happy to offer this proprietary method to assess teams to help your teams grow.

While reading this, however, remember that the results provided give you a snapshot of the team based on research data and corollations. It gives a sense of a teams weaker and stronger characteristics. This is not meant to be used as a psychological diagnosis by a medical professional. The results shown are probabilistic and may not represent specific interpersonal behaviors between team members.

What is "Overall Team Score"?

Individual Cykometrix reports contain 7 Cykometrix characteristics: Execution, Collaboration, Presence, Leadership, Empathy, Dependability, Collaboration, and Cognition. You can find details on exactly what each means in the last section of this report and in the first section of each Individual Report. Each participant receives a Quality Score (QS) calculated as the average of all 7 Cykometrix. The Overall Team Score is a type of average of the whole team's Quality Scores (QS). A high score usually means the team has fairly high average Cykometrix characteristics. A score of 50 or more is generally good, but obvious improvements can be identified with analysis. If a team improves lackluster characteristics, the team will perform better and get along better too!

What is "Team Effectiveness"?

Psychological research shows that a team's effectiveness is based on some specific personality traits, behavioral patterns, and abilities, all of which can be improved with proper training. Based on the data collected from the team, we calculate this number and put it here. A Team Effectiveness of 50 or more is good, but the higher, the better.

What is "Team Climate"?

Team Climate represents where we correlate various factors from the data collected, based on modern research, to determine the expected climate within the team when stress levels are nominal. This number weighs heavily on the personalities involved and a number of other factors. A score of 50 or more will be average or okay. The higher the score, the better a team's climate is likely to be.

Conclusions from the "Team Personality Matrix"

This table shows how the measured personalities of different team members match along with the possible risk of conflict or discomfort based on the size and color of the circles. Warnings made frmo this matrix will provide additional details.

WARNINGS

Whenever you see this symbol, it means there are details written down for you at the end of the section explaining why the warning is there. The written blurb within the warning section will explain what triggered the warning and provide context with which you will be able to form a strategy to reduce or eliminate this possible issue. If you see green checkmarks, all is well and no obvious warnings need to be mentioned.

Team Overview: Cykometrix Charts

These charts contain the 7 Cykometrix and a company average as a benchmark. The description of each Cykometrix is located at the end of this section of the report. These may change over time as team members evolve, improve, and generally change.

Risk Factors by Team Member

This table illustrates different issues teams may face from individual team member behavioral patterns, based on the provided data from each member. These only indicate a likelihood of each situation tracked by column happening in each individual case. We use data from past experiences to flesh this out, as taken from our questionnaires. Trouble spots can be addressed by supporting team members, and then providing specialized training.

Enhanced 360º Team Review

This section is generated as a whole from each team member answering questions about each other team member through peer reviews. Bands show averages for the team, individual evaluations are noted, and averages for each of the 5 360º categories are noted along with company averages for reference. This information can be used to adjust through training and personal growth how each team member and team leader operates, communicates, and works together. Perception is important as well. As always, when anything of note can be used to improve the team, it will be noted in the section's Warning area near the bottom. Contrary to other sections, this section includes anonymous comments by the team members themselves for review and self-evaluation purposes.

Our expert system has determined what each individual team member should be working on to improve their ability to be effective within a team environment. We've taken the care to write down characteristics to be improved for each member in each Individual Report. Combining all the information for this team, we offer suggestions on what type of training would best improve the team as a whole. We do this by determining in what areas the team could make the largest gains and improvements overall.

Below, you will find two (2) recommendations that will help this team become more effective. The other sections of this report will go into further detail on how to modulate training specifically for this tea and its members.

Here are the types of training that are most likely to improve Team Effectiveness:

• Emotional Intelligence Education and Training: this training type will help team members recognize their own emotions and those of others. Normally, EI training also helps individuals find tricks to regulate their own emotions and to use their emotions productively in communications and to become more resilient to stressors.
• Trust Training: this training is designed to help teas develop trust with each other. Building trust is usually a long-term affair tied to building relationships. Good trust training brings people together, helps team members build understanding of individual motivators, and create more constructive dialog.

Thomas Stein (The Commander) - QS: 65